Fact Check: More Teacher Voices on the School Board?

 

Image: ratingStatement: “Want to help San Diego schools? Get more accountability on the board? Get more teacher voices on the school board? Sign here,” Jeff Smith, a professional signature collector, told potential voters about a proposal to expand the San Diego Unified board to include appointees, according to Union-Tribune article on Dec. 29.

Determination: Misleading

Analysis: A group called San Diegans 4 Great Schools is campaigning to expand the school board to include four new members appointed by a new committee of parent leaders, university chiefs and a business representative. The plan would also impose term limits and change the way the elected members are chosen, making them run exclusively in subdistricts instead of the whole district.

Right now, the group has hired professional signature gatherers to help get the idea onto the ballot. The Union-Tribune quoted Jeff Smith telling possible voters at a Target store in Mission Valley that the proposal would get more teacher voices on the board, among other selling points.

Will their plan help schools or bring more accountability to the board, as Smith said? Those questions are at the heart of the debate over the unusual idea. And we won’t really know unless or until it actually plays out.

But the other point that Smith made — getting more teacher voices on the school board — isn’t just a matter of opinion. Getting more teachers or “teacher voices” on the board isn’t included anywhere in the plan that Smith was advocating. While it’s possible that the committee could appoint teachers to the board, they could just as easily appoint more parents, CEOs or chiropractors if they chose.

That’s why we’ve determined this statement is misleading.

Scott Himelstein, the president of San Diegans 4 Great Schools, says the group is not advancing the claim that Smith made about teachers on the board. However, Himelstein did make a separate argument that the proposal would help teachers do their jobs better by stabilizing the board.

Bob Glaser, the consultant who is coordinating the signature collectors, said he also told the crews that “more teacher voices” can’t be used as a pitch for signatures. “That’s gone,” Glaser said.

We tried to track down Jeff Smith himself, since we usually talk to anyone we’re fact checking and run our findings past them. But Glaser said they don’t have any signature gatherers named Jeff Smith. Glaser believes whoever was quoted and photographed by the U-T gave a fake name to the reporter. (A trick that all us journalists are susceptible to. I don’t ask for ID either.) We stopped by the Mission Valley Target to look for him. No luck. Jeff Smith, if you’re out there, call us!

If you disagree with our determination or analysis, please express your thoughts in the comments section of this blog post. Explain your reasoning.

Please contact Emily Alpert directly at emily.alpert@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.550.5665 and follow her on Twitter: twitter.com/emilyschoolsyou. You can also email new Fact Check suggestions to factcheck@voiceofsandiego.org. What claim should we explore next?

Voice of San Diego is a nonprofit that depends on you, our readers. Please donate to keep the service strong. Click here to find out more about our supporters and how we operate independently.


Emily Alpert

Emily Alpert
  • 422 Posts
  • 21
    Followers

Show comments
Before you comment, read these simple guidelines on what is not allowed.

2 comments
John de Beck
John de Beck subscriber

So the guy getting PAID for collecting signatures is part of a grass roots effort to reform our City Schools? Grass roots efforts are valuable ...but PAID fOLKS have an incentive to say ANYTHING to get the signatures. Unpaid volunteers are far more credible. The law should require a notice that IDENTIFIES paid signature gatherers. Then people would be better informed about how grass roots all this stuff ISN'T! Of course, the paid signature gatherers must be registered voters, and that is never checked by the signers, just on the form sent in. Mr. Smith may not even be a registered voter..someone else may be signing the forms he submits. Who knows what incentives lurk in the minds of these paid gunslingers for democracy? $$$$ is why folks want the board to change, and $$$ are how you get signatures... partners all.

deBeck
deBeck

So the guy getting PAID for collecting signatures is part of a grass roots effort to reform our City Schools? Grass roots efforts are valuable ...but PAID fOLKS have an incentive to say ANYTHING to get the signatures. Unpaid volunteers are far more credible. The law should require a notice that IDENTIFIES paid signature gatherers. Then people would be better informed about how grass roots all this stuff ISN'T! Of course, the paid signature gatherers must be registered voters, and that is never checked by the signers, just on the form sent in. Mr. Smith may not even be a registered voter..someone else may be signing the forms he submits. Who knows what incentives lurk in the minds of these paid gunslingers for democracy? $$$$ is why folks want the board to change, and $$$ are how you get signatures... partners all.