State Moves to Block ‘High-Cost’ Capital Appreciation Bonds

State Moves to Block ‘High-Cost’ Capital Appreciation Bonds

Photo by Sam Hodgson

Ben Hueso

 

State Treasurer Bill Lockyer and State Schools Superintendent Tom Torlakson asked California school districts and county education offices Thursday to impose a moratorium on issuing capital appreciation bonds. In a letter, they asked school officials to wait until lawmakers pass legislation tightening up the rules on school district borrowing.

Capital appreciation bonds, or CABs as they have become known, have become highly controversial since a Voice of San Diego story outlined a deal at the Poway Unified School District, where taxpayers will eventually pay almost $1 billion to pay off a loan of $126 million.

Dozens of districts across California have issued the bonds, which often don’t require repayment for decades and allow districts to push the cost of borrowing onto future generations. The Los Angeles Times calculated that districts across the state owe more than $16.3 billion in the loans.

Here’s a snippet from the letter that went out to districts today:

In too many cases, CAB deals have forced taxpayers to pay more than 10 times the principal to retire the bonds. Also, the transactions have been structured with 40-year terms that delay interest and principal payments for decades, resulting in huge balloon payments and burdens on future taxpayers that cannot be justified. Too frequently, board members and the public have not been fully informed about the costs and risks associated with CABs. In some cases, board membershave reported they were not even aware they approved the sale of CABs.

The letter doesn’t define “high cost” bonds. As we’ve described, there are big differences between CABs with 25-year terms and those with longer terms. The letter hints that bonds with terms of longer than 25 years are at issue here.

Local state Assemblyman Ben Hueso has pledged to introduce legislation shortly on school bond borrowing.

Hueso’s spokeswoman, Paola Avila, said Thursday the legislation should be introduced in a week or so.

“We’re still working on the language,” Avila said.

The letter notes that “remedial legislation is needed to prevent abuses and ensure that both school board members and the public obtain timely, accurate, complete, and clear information about the costs of CABs, and alternatives, before CABs are issued.”

You can read Lockyer and Torlakson’s letter in full here.

Will Carless is an investigative reporter at Voice of San Diego currently focused on local education. You can reach him at will.carless@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.550.5670.

Like VOSD on Facebook.

Disclosure: Voice of San Diego members and supporters may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover. For a complete list of our contributors, click here.

Voice of San Diego is a nonprofit that depends on you, our readers. Please donate to keep the service strong. Click here to find out more about our supporters and how we operate independently.


Will Carless

Will Carless

Will Carless is the former head of investigations at Voice of San Diego. He currently lives in Montevideo, Uruguay, where he is a freelance foreign correspondent and occasional contributor to VOSD. You can reach him at will.carless.work@gmail.com.

  • 361 Posts
  • 21
    Followers

Show comments
Before you comment, read these simple guidelines on what is not allowed.

6 comments
Jerry Hall
Jerry Hall subscriber

It seems what would be most interesting is tracing the source of these funding vehicles. What firms are promoting them, what firms are backing them. There must be a limited number of companies and representatives that would stoop this low to promote these products. Odd, we put our Fed banking systems in place to harness the rampant corruption and collapse of myriad of banks in the beginning of the 20th century and now we're faced with a >significantly< reduced banking and financial-services provider pool - that are ultimately going to bring us more and more disastrous products like this. Who's watching the industry? Shouldn't it be much easier now that we have so few major institutions? .

DataJuncture
DataJuncture

It seems what would be most interesting is tracing the source of these funding vehicles. What firms are promoting them, what firms are backing them. There must be a limited number of companies and representatives that would stoop this low to promote these products. Odd, we put our Fed banking systems in place to harness the rampant corruption and collapse of myriad of banks in the beginning of the 20th century and now we're faced with a >significantly< reduced banking and financial-services provider pool - that are ultimately going to bring us more and more disastrous products like this. Who's watching the industry? Shouldn't it be much easier now that we have so few major institutions? .

Mark Giffin
Mark Giffin subscribermember

Hope if that occurs its reported. SDUSD again proves it is untrustworthy.

mgland
mgland

Hope if that occurs its reported. SDUSD again proves it is untrustworthy.

Mark Giffin
Mark Giffin subscribermember

It was a form of Child Abuse.

mgland
mgland

It was a form of Child Abuse.