voiceofsandiego.org: Cafesandiego... 5 Simple Reasons to Support George George
an independent nonprofit |

5 Simple Reasons to Support George George

Published: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:05 AM PDT



I am a resident of Rancho Penasquitos and have been for 21 years. I am also a fire captain who has worked at the Rancho Bernardo Fire Station for three years.

I would like to start today’s blog with some quick, simple reasons why I am supporting George George for the 5th district city council seat.

    1.) George George is the only candidate who has ANY public safety experience.

    We have now had two major, catastrophic fires in San Diego. We have seen councilmembers “talk the talk” on improving public safety but very little has been done. As a career firefighter, I have watched our public safety services erode year after year. We are at a crossroads as a city -- do we tackle this problem head on or do we eventually become a city that can’t protect its citizens or visitors? That’s the path we are headed down without a councilmember like George.

    2.) George’s campaign is not funded by developers.

    George has taken ZERO DOLLARS from developers. His opponent, Carl DeMaio, has taken nearly $50,000. His financial reports read like a “Who’s Who” in the development world in San Diego. Check it out on the Center on Policy Initiative’s web site.

    3.) George has lived in the District for 45 years.

    George has a long record of living and voting in the 5th district. He and his wife, JoAnn, raised their children in Rancho Bernardo. George has coached youth sports in the community, attends church in the area and owns a small business in the district. His opponent, Carl DeMaio, has never voted in District 5 and has only lived there a matter of months. DeMaio claimed in a court document to be a resident of Virginia while at the same time he was registered to vote in San Diego. When asked in public forums to explain this discrepancy, DeMaio brushes past it. Do we need a councilmember who is a San Diegan only when it suits his political and financial purposes?

    4.) George has successfully managed multi-million dollar budgets as an assistant fire chief in San Diego and a fire chief in Solana Beach.

    We have seen lots of campaign rhetoric over the past few years where candidates are quick to say they can clean up our financial crisis. What they find, however, when they get to city hall is that it isn’t so easy to do. Legal and financial constraints make running San Diego “like a business” a near impossibility. We need somebody who has both government and private business financial experience. As a fire chief and now a small business owner, George has both.

    5.) George has no political agenda and would spend his time on the council devoted to us as his constituents and not to planning his next political move.

    George’s first and only priority will be San Diego and its issues -- nothing else. He has no financial or political motive for running for City Council. George is running because he sees the safety of our citizens eroding every single day and he understands what we need to do to fix our problems.



My next post: Why George is the right person to help solve our public safety crisis.

--FRANK DECLERCQ




36 Comments so far on this story...

Excuse me Frank, but aren't you be hypocritical here in your complaint #2 -- you prematurely supported Todd Gloria for District 3, and his donors are all the same as Carl DeMaio's! Go look for yourself.// I am disgusted with the lock the establishment has on the promotion of these candidates -- they are all developers, hoteliers and their lobbyists. What is gross is seeing the CCDC board members and staff backing these candidates.// The only proof that the local political races are not partisan is that right-wing DeMaio and lefty Gloria are supported by the same establishment players -- BUT MUCH WORSE is that these candidates attract support not by virtue of their political ethics but rather, by their seeming promise to please those who pay.

Posted by Christopher Hall | reply to this comment
April 14, 2008 11:06 pm

Well said Frank. The difference from DeMaio is striking.

Posted by shortandsweet | reply to this comment
April 14, 2008 11:26 pm

What a concept: a rooted,propertied,ma resident with a distinguished public service record with more time in harness than his elusive opponent has in the men's room AND his spokesperson is not an author of fiction novels but someone who knows of whom he speaks because he's been on the Fire line with him when the chips were down and lives on the line.No half steppin jive-assed clitter freaks here. Just citizens not con-men! What a concept in politics.Holy Smokes he's management too! These guys reflect more the conservative tradition of family values, ethics, morality and public service than most of the Central Cmte of the County GOP combined,IF, as we are lead to believe they really do support the other guy rather than doing the neo-con goose step just to keep their seniority at the County GOP trough. Can you you say CROSS-OVER? It's sooo easy!

Posted by Alienated Conservative | reply to this comment
April 14, 2008 11:28 pm

The fact that a prominent union shill is the one spouting on behalf of George x 2 ought to tell readers everything there is to know about this candidate. As to point #1, What, only a firefighter or policeman can run for council now? As to point #3, the councilmember for District 3, Atkins, is also, ironically, from Virginia. Should she resign her seat immediately, as she is not San Diego born and bred? Regarding point #2, do you live in a house or apartment? That was built by a developer! And on point #5, well, I just direct you back to my first sentence in this commentary. Please, de Clercq, is this all you've got???

Posted by Robert | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 7:17 am

There is no "public safety crisis".

Posted by Larry | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 8:08 am

How about answers to the following: Has he retired? If yes, at what age? Is he in the DROP Program? If yes, how will returning to the City as an employee, albeit City council Member, affect his pension status? Did he purchase any service credits? If yes, how many years? Was he ever actively involved in the community council and/or community planning group? How about being frank with us Frank and respond to these questions.

Posted by Buddy in Mission Valley | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 8:08 am

Why won't Carl explain why he still claimed Virginia residency a few years ago when he was voting in San Diego?

Posted by Curious | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 9:09 am

Hey Alienated Conservative -- your post should win a Pulitzer Prize -- it is brilliant. My favorite is 'No half steppin jive-assed clitter freaks here.' Really, you are awesome.

Posted by Christopher Hall | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 9:23 am

It's hilarious that you believe george's small-time retirement job selling popcorn will somehow prepare him to manage San Diego's MULTI BILLION dollar budget. We need REAL solutions to our city's budget problems (from what I hear, its a little different than selling popcorn). Our city can't afford to elect another incompetent council member.

Posted by Real Solutions | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 9:36 am

Here goes DeClerque and all his cronies telling more lies. It really is quite comical watching the union bosses jump up and down, hurl accusations based on faulty information, and actually thinkthe people are STUPID enough to beleive them. You know why the unions are so nasty towards DeMaio? They fear DeMaio's solutions which would mean the end of the taxpayer funded gravy train at City Hall. Go Carl!

Posted by Union Lies, Taxpayer Cries | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 10:00 am

Ref post #10 - What lies? #9 - You missed the text referrenc G2's career handling multi-million dollar budgets. The elitist shots at his small retirement business is a tad unwarranted. Ref post #1 - Komrade Hall, your post is so off topic irrelevant, I don't even know what to say.

Posted by D | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 10:16 am

Hey Union Lies, Taxpayer Cries, check out DirtyDemaio.com - all the facts and supporting documentation is right there for your unaccepting eyes to review. Faulty information, how about faulty blind-trust?

Posted by get real... | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 10:30 am

What was george doing during our recent fires? Carl DeMaio was the volunteer coordinator at Qualcomm. See for yourself-- link

Posted by Real Solutions | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 10:30 am

"...only candidate who has ANY public safety experience"--hmm, last councilman with public safety experience: Byron Wear--not too good!

Posted by Steve K | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 10:31 am

I think one important question which I hope Frank would answer is whether Mr. George has any experience/understan of the whole host of other issues that the city council deals with besides the intercine warfare over labor. Does he know CEQA through working on a community planning group? Why is he opposed to managed competition when D5 STRONGLY supported it? What about traffic and plans for I-15 (i.e. does he even know what SANDAG stands for). How about redevelopment and the way it works? My biggest problem with Mr. George is that we do not need another council member who "learns on the job" - Brian has been largely ineffective in the district except for being Mr. empathy during the fires because of a lack of experience and connection to municipal affairs.

Posted by CMR | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 10:49 am

"Real Solutions" and "Union Lies, Taxpayer Cries" are obvious Public Relations posts funded by DeMaio. Overall, the posts today are at least an improvement over yesterday's PR love fest of DeMaio - complete with _C_arl Rove talking points. The interesting thing is that the same phonies that post about union bosses and city welfare queens are all funded by taxpayer dollars that have been siphoned away from providing services to DeMaio's consulting scam which are then donated to his political campaign. So when we talk about government waste, which does exist, are we talking about firefighters or are we talking about consultants? One will save your life when need be and the other will rack up billable hours telling you all the ways to cut the other. In this council race you have a clear choice between one and the other. Choose well.

Posted by Hypocri-size me!!! | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 11:04 am

Actually, D, I find Hall's comments to be very much on topic. Granted, Mr. Hall often finds unnecessarily obtuse ways to express himself, but I think his particular remarks in #1 hit the bullseye! The special interests do indeed seem to be equal opportunity corrupters, whether their chosen puppet, er, elected official, is on the left or the right. de Clercq has posted some of the most ridiculous drivel on here today that I've seen in a long time. But, no surprise, really, considering from whence it comes.

Posted by Robert | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 11:07 am

Is anyone on here a District 5 voter? If not, why comment? If you don't live in the district, you surely have no authority to be commenting about issues and concerns that don't affect you. I'm a real, live District 5 voter who will vote for Carl DeMaio. Fact is, city council seats are non-partisan seats. Unions and developers have too much power at city hall. I think Carl will do a great job as a watchdog representing our district. All of you concerned about safety - check the mayor's budget to see he is increasing budgets for fire and police in FY09. The mayor controls the budget, not the city council. It's not like Carl will force the mayor to cut police and fire. Besides, it's my opinion that George is basically being wheeled out by the unions to run because they're scared of Carl.

Posted by District 5 Voter | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 11:14 am

Is anyone on here a District 5 voter? If not, why comment? If you don't live in the district, you surely have no authority to be commenting about issues and concerns that don't affect you. I'm a real, live District 5 voter who will vote for Carl DeMaio. Fact is, city council seats are non-partisan seats. Unions and developers have too much power at city hall. I think Carl will do a great job as a watchdog representing our district. All of you concerned about safety - check the mayor's budget to see he is increasing budgets for fire and police in FY09. The mayor controls the budget, not the city council. It's not like Carl will force the mayor to cut police and fire. Besides, it's my opinion that George is basically being wheeled out by the unions to run because they're scared of Carl.

Posted by District 5 Voter | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 11:14 am

With two major fires in the last 4+ years, the top priority in District 5 should be public safety, specifically Fire Safety. That being said, George George is the ideal candidate for Council.

Posted by Rowdimus | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 11:19 am

DECLERCQ- do you really believe george has "no political agenda"? Explain why he was reluctantly recruited by the city labor union last minuet? Why does the same city labor union continue to pour money into unethical attack pieces on DeMaio? The fact is, george is just another patzi for the same city labor union that got us into this financial mess. No political agenda?!? We're not stupid!

Posted by Rocky | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 11:21 am

Knowing that Carl DeMaio reads and understands City financial statements, the City Labor Unions with help from Democrats searched for somebody to run against DeMaio. They recruited and promised to bankroll George at the last minute. A Councilman DeMaio will protect taxpayers against having to pay for what we can't afford. He understands the diferences between "needs" and "wants" and has the courage to publicly explain those differences.

Posted by Honest Disclosure Pleez | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 12:05 pm

Post #19, I'm not a D5 voter, but the idiot you D5 voters put in office will affect the entire city. Of course Komrade Hall, who lives 550 miles from San Diego in Shingletown CA, yes, his posting is completely irrelvant and inappropriate.

Posted by D | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 12:33 pm

District 5 Voter, I can understand your concerns about union influence in City Hall. I've known George for about 28 years. I watched him transition from a Fire Captain to 2nd in charge of the SDFD. As an upper level manager, he was no longer represented by the union and had to balance the interests of the city and employees. I've always known him to be fair, independent and ethical. You can count on him to do the right thing and be a good steward of money and resources. But it sounds as though your mind is set, therefore be diligent in you fact-checking and your conscience will guide your voting hand.

Posted by Captain T | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 1:20 pm

Thank you Captain T. That is the kind of dialogue I'm sure the creators of this blogt were hoping for. I know I certainly appreciate your candor. I also appreciate your defense of George; I'm just not convinced that George has the kind of experience to effect any change at city hall. Change is what city hall needs and is something I know D5 voters want and need. The unions clearly have too much power (DROP, purchasing additional service credits, etc.) and I think most D5 voters are fed up with that. We want our potholes filled, streets repaved, recycled water for landscaping, and low police and fire response times. We don't want puffy and padded benefits, that no one else gets, being paid to city staff instead of the things I mentioned.

Posted by District 5 Voter | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 1:38 pm

Well, when de Clercq retires from firefighting, he can certainly start a second career in public relations, as a spinmeister, cuz that's all we've gotten all day long from him. Okay, Frank, now how about answering the concerns of some of the commenters on here, instead of just the predictable, one-sided "sales job."

Posted by Robert | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 2:43 pm

i find it interesting that the posts yesterday did not disrespect george george--in other words, DeMaio's campaign has stayed entirely positive. YET...it is the George campaign and his union supporters that are running a nasty, bitter, negative campaign comprised mainly of personal attacks against DeMaio. Shows me who has CLASS and who is focusing on the issues of importance to San Diegans.

Posted by Positive vs Negative | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 2:48 pm

I will only answer questions to those that have the decency to sign their name. What makes these blogs go sideways is that the Voice does not require a person to verify who they are. How can we expect to hold meaningful debate and dialog with people that are afraid to say who the are and what they believe in? Oh well. George George has not bought service credit.He retired many years ago with a normal service retirement. He is not in the DROP program. Getting elected to city council will have no effect on his retirement. He has lived in RB for 45 years, raised a family there coached little league and volunteered in the community. He has lived in District 5 longer than Carl has been alive. He wants to see the lack of vital fire resources addressed not undressed.

Posted by Frank De Clercq | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 4:04 pm

District 5 voter, you make a good point about voters from the district, given that we have district only elections.So why is the president of Ace Parking supporting DeMaio financially?Does he live in the district?Or is he planning to put a paid parking lot there?

Posted by JF | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 4:28 pm

What are DeMaio's true motives? He's not from the 5th district so where will his loyalties be? He clearly is a smart guy with money, so why does he want a job that requires so much work and pays so little. I strongly suspect there is a hidden agenda here somewhere.

Posted by Citizen X | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 8:19 pm

DeMaio needs to go back to Capital Hill where his kind belong. He is the epitome of special Interest, or he wouldn't be sneaking about the halls of C ST trying to get his lobby heard. Is this what the voters of D5 want? I am a resident of Scripps Ranch, and do not want the republican lobby sitting on my district selling me, and my family out for big business, and that is what this Bush Pawn does.

Posted by TheGunny | reply to this comment
April 16, 2008 8:22 am

The only crisis in public safety is keeping the outrageous benefits they have obtained. that is what George is running for

Posted by lam | reply to this comment
April 16, 2008 8:37 am

One last thing. I'm concerned with the comments about how long Carl has lived in D5. He's being called a carpetbagger, etc. So the unions resort to name calling and Carl just takes it like a man. I appreciate Carl's doing that. Shows he's got class and decency. What makes America great is that we are a melting pot. What makes San Diego great is that we get the best and brightest that want to live here and help make our city great. I don't care if Carl has only lived a day in D5 - I'm still voting for him, especially after seeing the stuff put up here by the unions. I've met with Carl and he does have the best interests of D5 constituents on his mind. And I'm convinced now, more than ever, that Carl is the best choice for city council for our district.

Posted by District 5 Voter | reply to this comment
April 16, 2008 9:52 am

I appreciate seeing some of the good dialogue and don't quite understand the nameless flamers with no creditability. Regardless, I have to agree Citizen X...why would someone like Carl De be so passionate about a job that just doesn't pay that much (even after a much needed raise at the city council level...you get what you pay for...but I digress)? Yet, you now have a candidate who has spent most of his life as a civil "servant" and lives in the district...sounds like somebody I would want. Good luck to George...sounds like you have to face the fires again to serve this city!

Posted by Matt Nilsen | reply to this comment
April 16, 2008 6:18 pm

I appreciate seeing some of the good dialogue and don't quite understand the nameless flamers with no creditability. Regardless, I have to agree Citizen X...why would someone like Carl De be so passionate about a job that just doesn't pay that much (even after a much needed raise at the city council level...you get what you pay for...but I digress)? Yet, you now have a candidate who has spent most of his life as a civil "servant" and lives in the district...sounds like somebody I would want. Good luck to George...sounds like you have to face the fires again to serve this city!

Posted by Matt Nilsen | reply to this comment
April 16, 2008 6:18 pm

This is going off topic, but I have to.. Bush Pawn?! I'm seeing a KPBS nature show here! """The Bush Pawn will winter in a burrow under the roots of a very big fir tree... In spring he emerges and calls for a mate..."9-11! 9-11!" If no one answers then we have six more weeks of fair and balanced news."""

Posted by Captain T | reply to this comment
April 16, 2008 7:58 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
50c54e6



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.