Monday, July 31, 2006 | I was happy to see an article on classical/art/choose-an-adjective music on the website. However, I think that Cathy Robbins’s fault-finding with local music criticism was an unwelcome detour. What are words like “uneven,” “workmanlike,” and “maddeningly pure” supposed to mean? When Jonathan Saville reviewed concerts for the Reader, one of the things I really enjoyed was that he always gave enough concrete details that you knew what he meant by his adjectives. Ms. Robbins doesn’t do that, and she doesn’t cite her own qualifications, so the end result comes across as pretentious and belittling. And what’s inherently wrong with a music reviewer bringing the score to a concert?

If Ms. Robbins wants to write music reviews for, I would happily read them. But she doesn’t need to cut down other publications’ reviewers in order to do that.

Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.