I’m not usually one to harp (I play the violin, actually), but this is a big deal.

Yesterday, on the front page of the Business section, the Union-Tribune characterized the latest housing prices from DataQuick Information Systems as the “lowest median price since 2003.” A similar mention was made in the second paragraph of the story, where it was claimed the $460,000 overall median price has not been seen since April 2003.

The front page of the Business section from the Nov. 14 edition.

Why is this such a big deal? A quick reminder from my post yesterday:

The story claimed that the all-home median price … reached its lowest point since April 2003.

Actually, the all-home median price logged by DataQuick for last month was $460,000. That marked the lowest level since April 2004, when the median was $445,000.

That’s quite a difference from April 2003, when the median was $352,000.

I’m lectured often in interviews about the grave responsibility that comes with reporting on a region’s real estate market, because of the devastation wielded by negative news on consumer confidence.

You want to talk consumer confidence: How many people, how many readers of the U-T’s paper or online versions freaked out yesterday, thinking the county’s median home price has slid $93,000 more than it has?

I’ve yet to find a correction to this story. There’s not one here or here.

Or here, in the “for the record” corner of page A2. There were two corrections today, both to mis-referenced military battles.


Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.