To continue my series of posts on city of San Diego outsourcing issues, I pose another question.

When we say “outsourcing” just how far “out” are we talking?

Councilwoman Sherri Lightner asked the question at Tuesday’s City Council hearing on the outsourcing deadlock between the Mayor’s Office and the city’s white- and blue-collar labor unions.

“Is there a requirement here that the companies be local? The contractors be local? The jobs be local?” Lightner asked city staff.

Lightner was concerned about the loss of city revenue should companies and workers live, work and pay taxes, in say Texas.

Staff responded there was no restriction against companies from outside the area, but that jobs would require workers to live in or around the city. Garbage collectors, for one, couldn’t commute from El Paso.

But, Lightner said, certain jobs could be performed from anywhere. Like data processing.

Funny Lightner should mention data processing. The city has put out for bid portions of its information technology services now performed by city-created nonprofit, Data Processing Corp.

In the city’s request for proposals, there was no restriction against companies providing services outside the area, or even outside the country. In fact, the city expects each bidder to do so.

“I anticipate that each responder will intend to leverage their existing operations on-shore or off-shore to support their options and related costs for each option,” said Naresh Lachmandas, the city’s chief information officer and director of information technology. “I believe we have a requirement that the bidders must be incorporated within the U.S.”

Lachmandas also said the city would account for local companies when evaluating the bids and expect each bid to have some part of its operations in San Diego. The city’s focus, however, is to save money.

“We’re always looking at what’s best from a cost standpoint for taxpayers especially given the $179 million budget deficit,” Lachmandas said.

Bidding for the IT services closed last Friday and the city is reviewing the nine proposals that were submitted.

One of those proposals came from the city’s current provider, Data Processing Corp.

Board Chairman Reed Vickerman couldn’t discuss Data Processing’s bid, but he too expected the city would receive proposals with out of area workers. Currently, all of Data Processing Corp.’s employees are local.

“As a taxpayer, I just think the taxpayers ought to be thinking about whether this is a time to have people in the area losing jobs,” Vickerman said.


Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.