El Capitan Reservoir and dam on April 13, 2025 in Lakeside. / Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego
El Capitan Reservoir and dam on April 13, 2025, in Lakeside. / Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego

This story has been updated.

The city of San Diego is in the middle of litigation centered on one of its  dams rated in poor condition by the state, and the attorney on the opposing side is one city officials are all too familiar with. 

His name is Vincent Bartolotta, and he’s representing a company called El Monte Nature Preserve, LLC.  

The company is suing San Diego for releasing six billion gallons of water from the El Capitan Dam and Reservoir into the surrounding areas “without notice” back in 2023. El Monte Nature Preserve’s nearby property was one of those areas, and the release of water caused its water table to rise by roughly 40 feet, resulting in “damage to the value of the property,” according to the lawsuit

A water table is the area underneath the earth’s surface where soil is saturated with water. If it rises, it can derail plans to build or dig. 

In this case, most of El Monte Nature Preserve’s property is zoned for sand mining, which involves extracting sand from the earth and using or selling it for things like construction projects. 

The company was in the process of obtaining a permit from the county for the actual sand mining to occur. However, now that the property’s water table has risen, it can no longer be mined for sand because the Regional Water Quality Control Board doesn’t allow sand mining below the water table. 

Now, El Monte Nature Preserve is suing the city for damages and negligence and is asking for $300 million. 

El Capitan Reservoir and dam on April 13, 2025, in Lakeside. / Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego
El Capitan Reservoir and dam on April 13, 2025, in Lakeside. / Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego

“[El Monte Nature Preserve] has an intention to excavate valuable resources on the property that it owns,” the lawsuit says. “The city’s conduct has deprived [El Monte Nature Preserve] of all economically viable use of its property rights. This had a negative impact on [El Monte Nature Preserve] economically and interfered with distinct investment-backed expectations.” 

El Monte Nature Preserve is open to discussing several proposals with the city that could result in a win-win for both sides of the dispute, including a potential partial solution of cleaning out the San Diego River. 

The city has denied all of El Monte Nature Preserve’s claims, saying in court documents that the company is not entitled “to any relief whatsoever from the city.” The city attorney’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 

A jury trial is set for Dec. 5. 

The Man Behind the City’s Oldest Lawsuit 

This isn’t Bartolotta’s first time facing off against San Diego. In fact, he’s the attorney behind the city’s longest-running lawsuit, which spanned a total of 20 years. 

The plaintiff in that case was Rocque “Rocky” de la Fuente II, a developer who entered into an agreement with the city of San Diego in 1986 to develop a 312-acre plot of land in Otay Mesa. 

De la Fuente later accused the city of sabotaging the project, scrapping plans that he had for the land, like an airport, and rerouting border traffic so trucks clogged the property, which he said ruined the land’s potential. 

De la Fuente sued the city in 1995 and initially won the case, putting the city on the hook for $154 million. But appeals, more lawsuits and battles in the courtroom continued for years until the two sides finally agreed to a settlement in 2015. 

The settlement called for two of the city’s former insurance carriers to pay $25 million to de la Fuente’s business park and $8.2 million to the city. 

“The city is aware of our firm and of me,” Bartolotta told Voice of San Diego. “And the city is aware that we don’t file frivolous cases, we take legitimate cases. They should be willing to sit and discuss a resolution with us, we’re willing to talk with the city.” 

About El Capitan Dam 

The status of El Capitan Dam is complicated. 

It goes back to an incident that occurred in Northern California back in 2017. The Oroville Dam spillway disintegrated, leading to the evacuation of more than 180,000 people living downstream. 

That led to new state laws requiring stronger safety standards at California’s dams. Today, the Division of Safety of Dams has water level restrictions on five reservoirs in San Diego County, including El Capitan Dam, where the state has cut the storage capacity by more than half. 

When the city of San Diego released those six billion gallons of water from El Capitan Dam in 2023, it was to keep water levels low, according to a 2024 report by CBS 8

Around 2019, state regulators categorized El Capitan Dam as being in “poor condition,” the second-lowest level on the state’s dam safety scale, because of its seismic stability issues and need for “significant repair.” Lake Hodges Dam has the lowest rating in San Diego County, with its condition listed as “unsatisfactory.” 

Aug. 28 correction: This story has been updated to correct that the company was in the process of obtaining a permit with the county of San Diego for sand mining, not the city of San Diego. The entity that bars sand mining below the water table is the Regional Water Quality Control Board, not the city.

Tigist Layne is Voice of San Diego's north county reporter.

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. Isn’t city mismanagement fun? Instead of fixing the dams, 1.5 billion has been spent converting toilet water. Now the dams can’t hold the capacity, short changing current water supplies and toilet water is still under construction. And somewhere in this mess are the contracts driving up water prices while water is simply let go. Thank you Todd Gloria.

    1. You have to have water coming from auqiferes or dams before u get toilet water to clean for the tap.

        1. Start making cash right now… Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to 2000-2700+Dollar per week . I’ve started this job and I’ve never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here…

          JUST TEB ON MY PROFILE

  2. Why is most of a “nature preserve” company’s activity based on environmentally-destructive sand mining? Seems like a rename is in order.

    1. Regardless, did the city expose taxpayers to another lawsuit by another poor decision? If you’re so concerned.

  3. No, sand miners. You can’t have my tax dollars for this nonsense. And in naming your SAND MINE El Monte Nature Preserve, you detonated any credibility you ever had.

    1. This problem raises the all important issue of strategic water resource management. Now that we are in the midst of climate change and changing weather patterns it seems like San Diego, California and the country as a whole have focused their attention on renewable energy and not so much on water resource planning. We must remember that we can survive with electricity shortages but life can not survive without water.

  4. As a resident of El Monte valley, the El Monte nature preserve is anything but a preserve. The were mining the sand long before they had the permits. I encourage the voice of San Diego to investigate these scum bags and look into what they were doing.

  5. Rocky de la Fuente ran for president of the United States multiple times. He was a mentally ill man. What happened to the b.s. detector here?

Leave a comment
We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.