Reporters are well known for their hysterics and exaggeration, but this is the plain truth: San Diego is not even close to ready for the coming population boom of seniors.
Some of the statistics are starting to find a place in our consciousness. The share of old people is growing much faster than other groups. In just a three-year period, between 2020 and 2023, San Diego’s 65-plus population grew by 9 percent, while every other groups shrank, as Axios reported. Very soon we’ll have more old people than young. American society has never been proportioned in such a way and the proportions are only going to get more and more lopsided. We are in the early days.
The people retiring today don’t have as much money and assets as they did 20 years ago. Home ownership, which grants stability and equity to the old, is declining more rapidly in California than most places, because homes here cost so god-awful much. Among those lucky enough to own a home, the percentage of people who have paid it off by the age of 65 is also going down.
Roughly, two in five San Diego seniors don’t have enough money to meet their basic needs.
These factors are creating the first and most logistically-daunting problem: Old people don’t have anywhere to live. The share of homeless San Diegans who are 55 or older is 30 percent right now and that percentage is growing steadily. A few years ago, an apartment complex for seniors opened in Ramona with 62 units reserved for people with moderate income or less. More than 5,000 people ended up on the waiting list.
This is a problem rooted in the material world, one that could in theory be solved if we were willing to marshal the money and resources to do it. Humans have solved that type of problem many times. The existential challenges of aging particular to the United States are no less obvious and perhaps even more problematic. They are also in part responsible for the current state of affairs.
Old people are nearly invisible in our culture. We show reverence to youth, beauty and commerce, and so it should be no surprise that we treat old people like expended resources and look past them like ghosts.
This is not exactly the same within all subcultures. Some elders have a place in the family structure until their death. Asian and Latino women, for instance, are nearly twice as likely to not live alone as elder White and Black women, according to one study.
But America has a way of changing immigrants, just as much as immigrants have a way of changing it.
Take the phenomenon of elder orphans, people who live alone and have no relatives nearby or support group, the least visible of all seniors. The San Diego Seniors Community Foundation estimates that there are at least 130,000 elder orphans in the county now. One study found Black and Latino elders (as well as another category that included American Indians, Asians and Hawaiians) were more likely to be elder orphans than White people.
Class was the real leveler. People with low income were “associated with increased likelihood of being categorized as elder orphans,” the study found.
San Diego isn’t ready for the senior population boom, but the question is whether we can get ready. The task ahead is both monumental and surprisingly simple.
Paul Downey is 66 years old and a legend when it comes to aging work in San Diego. He recently retired as the head of Serving Seniors, which provides all kinds of help for people with little income. I spoke to him while he was on a road trip visiting national parks.
I asked if he could wave a magic wand, how we might change our future.
“Instead of viewing old people as a problem, we have to view them as a resource,” Downey said. “We’ve never in our history had this amount of collective wisdom. If we are smart and figure out how to tap into that wisdom and experience, that willingness to stay active and involved in the community, we can make everyone’s lives better, not just old people.”
This sea change is perhaps most necessary on an intangible level. Seniors are full of wisdom and stories — they have lived through all the same interpersonal dramas, tragedies and joys as young people. We should highly value all of that, seek it out and see it portrayed in our media.
But tapping into our senior population’s value could also provide concrete solutions to some of our most pressing dilemmas.
The childcare crisis in San Diego has been documented over and over to the point that it feels unsolvable. Meanwhile, seniors are struggling with loneliness and a lack of purpose.
What if we created facilities that served both populations? Old people could simply spend time at these places, fostering a multi-generational sense of community or they could volunteer as much or as little as they like — assuming they are able and willing (and pass some sort of vetting process.)
Here’s another easy one: housing. Who in San Diego is holding onto homes with extra rooms? Old people. Who needs extra income? Lots of old people. Who needs company and a place to live? Old people.
Elder Help, another local nonprofit, deals with exactly this. They match people looking for a home with elders who have extra space.
The results are, not surprisingly, life changing for the people involved.
Nearly 90 percent of clients “feel their quality of life is better,” Elder Help reports. Roughly 74 percent “feel safer at home.” And 94 percent “believe they are more likely to remain independent.”
I don’t know how many crises this can fix. Seniors may not be able to save us from climate change or the ravages of unbridled capitalism, but seeing elders as a resource changes the possibilities for the future on a profound level.
The American myth tells us that if we work hard we will get everything we deserve. But the seniors of today are unmasking this story. The question the rest of us must answer is whether we are willing to invest in those two out of five elder San Diegans who don’t have enough money to live a quality life.
“The window is still open to maybe get ahead of the biggest demographic shift in history but it’s closing rapidly,” said Downey. “If we don’t start taking action we’ll awake up in 2030 and 2035 and say where did all these old people come from and why didn’t we plan for this.”
In the meantime, go sit with the next old person you see. Tell them your story. Listen to theirs. Get some free therapy. You’ll both be better for it.

Twenty-three years ago, when I was in my early 50s, I made an appointment with my CA State Senator to discuss the huge glut of aging Baby Boomers looming in the future. My husband was suffering from an early onset form of dementia and I anticipated the financial and societal issues others would encounter. I was early for my meeting and waited almost an hour for her to terminate a phone conversation. I finally left, informing one of her staff about my wasted time and the issues I had wanted to discuss. There was no follow-up from her office.
I wish you had said who this Senator was.
This is an ageist article asking the young who are working, trying to build a life to give to those who already lived theirs!! It’s disgusting. Those “seniors” can move to cheaper states and make room for the younger generations.. it’s enough we have to subsidize their life with our pay roll tax via SS
What an amazingly selfish attitude you have. Did your parents have any children that lived?
Honey, we seniors have worked and paid the same SS tax as you. And people need to support their own existence, senior or not. And those who find purpose in helping others, congrats. That is a chosen and not pushed as a mandatory service. Many articles here I find odd as to the agenda journalism espoused.
Chris, thank you for your comment. I’m not sure what the agenda is that journalism espoused. We should all try to help others as we could find ourselves in a difficult situation someday.
The first sentence alone says it.
Reporters are well known for their hysterics and exaggeration.
You are correct!!
I don’t think you understand how this works, Jessica. We seniors paid into social security when we were young too, making it possible for seniors at the time to benefit from our hard work! It’s cyclical. Social security was designed this way. For you, at your young age to say “Those seniors can move to cheaper states and make room for the younger generations… it’s enough that we have to subsidize their life (s/b “lives”, btw) with our payroll tax via SS…”, is nothing more than expressing a youthful sense of entitlement that you haven’t yet outgrown. It’s entertaining for us seniors to read. When you reach the age of maturity, perhaps then you’ll understand. If not, then how about this rationale; we were here first! You came afterward. Just go back to wherever you came from. See how that works? Two can play the same game…
Oh my, why so bitter? Not nice! Hug and help a Senior Citizen. You will become old someday.
amazing yarn shop
We are already entering a situation where the young are subsidizing the elderly. Rearranging the entire economy to support an aging population is not going to be well received. The idea that tax dollars go to support services to an aging generation that owns most of the wealth is not going to sit well with the working population.
Berto, as long as Social Security has been around, the young have been subsidizing the elderly. There hasn’t been a rearranging of the entire economy until now, as we watch our institutions being obliterated from what they once were, and we will see seniors paying out of pocket for more than they ever had to before. They’re already 30% of those going homeless, as per this article, if they’re 65 or older. So whatever wealth you believe senior citizens are enjoying, it’s actually never been more difficult for seniors to stay housed as they age, especially if they’ve never owned a home before. Please understand that you will need to vote for those politicians who truly believe in expanding Social Security, rather than those who promise to protect it while simultaneously working to hurt it, like what we’re all witnessing today.
gee, Berto, who changed your diapers when you were a little baby?
This is a matter of demographics. The US fertility rate is 1.6 live births for women of child bearing age. The breakeven rate is 2.1, this means that not enough new babies are being born to replace those who have died. Our population is therefore getting older.
In the past we avoided the issues of an aging population by having a robust immigration. This filled in the gap with the immigrants who tend to be young and have multiple babies. We were able to maintain our economy and our standard of living because the immigrants were willing to work for low wages and not complain.
The current administration does not like the fact that the immigrants are Brown, they refer to this problem as “The Browning of America,” they have decided to seize and deport Brown people with or without warrants. They want to deport them to places too far away so they can’t come back.
If they are successful our nation will go into a deep recession, with rising prices and empty shelves as there will be no workforce to pick the fruits & vegetables, process the meat & eggs, build the houses , drive the trucks to deliver the goods, on and on. They are doing things that will hurt themselves and shorten their career as politicians, but they either don’t believe this will happen or they think they can avoid the consequences.(It’s good to be rich, it sucks to be you).
We as the American People will face a fundamental choice in the next 4 or so years, as the consequences of the Administration’s policies become clear. If as the experts forecast the recession comes to pass, Trump will have wrecked our economy and must be held accountable for that. If his Tariffs bring a new ‘Golden Age’ for people other than him, he is the most brilliant President we have ever had and millions of other people, myself included, are idiots for ever doubting him.
This is a matter of demographics. The US fertility rate is 1.6 live births for women of child bearing age. The breakeven rate is 2.1, this means that not enough new babies are being born to replace those who have died. Our population is therefore getting older.
In the past we avoided the issues of an aging population by having a robust immigration. This filled in the gap with the immigrants who tend to be young and have multiple babies. We were able to maintain our economy and our standard of living because the immigrants were willing to work for low wages and not complain.
The current administration does not like the fact that the immigrants are Brown, they refer to this problem as “The Browning of America,” they have decided to seize and deport Brown people with or without warrants. They want to deport them to places too far away so they can’t come back.
If they are successful our nation will go into a deep recession, with rising prices and empty shelves as there will be no workforce to pick the fruits & vegetables, process the meat & eggs, build the houses , drive the trucks to deliver the goods, on and on. They are doing things that will hurt themselves and shorten their career as politicians, but they either don’t believe this will happen or they think they can avoid the consequences.(It’s good to be rich, it sucks to be you).
We as the American People will face a fundamental choice in the next 4 or so years, as the consequences of the Administration’s policies become clear. If as the experts forecast the recession comes to pass, Trump will have wrecked our economy and must be held accountable for that. If his Tariffs bring a new ‘Golden Age’ for people other than him, he is the most brilliant President we have ever had and millions of other people, myself included, are idiots for ever doubting him.
This is a matter of demographics. The US fertility rate is 1.6 live births for women of child bearing age. The breakeven rate is 2.1, this means that not enough new babies are being born to replace those who have died. Our population is therefore getting older.
In the past we avoided the issues of an aging population by having a robust immigration. This filled in the gap with the immigrants who tend to be young and have multiple babies. We were able to maintain our economy and our standard of living because the immigrants were willing to work for low wages and not complain.
The current administration does not like the fact that the immigrants are Brown, they refer to this problem as “The Browning of America,” they have decided to seize and deport Brown people with or without warrants. They want to deport them to places too far away so they can’t come back.
If they are successful our nation will go into a deep recession, with rising prices and empty shelves as there will be no workforce to pick the fruits & vegetables, process the meat & eggs, build the houses , drive the trucks to deliver the goods, on and on. They are doing things that will hurt themselves and shorten their career as politicians, but they either don’t believe this will happen or they think they can avoid the consequences.(It’s good to be rich, it sucks to be you).
We as the American People will face a fundamental choice in the next 4 or so years, as the consequences of the Administration’s policies become clear. If as the experts forecast the recession comes to pass, Trump will have wrecked our economy and must be held accountable for that. If his Tariffs bring a new ‘Golden Age’ for people other than him, he is the most brilliant President we have ever had and millions of other people, myself included, are idiots for ever doubting him.
As the saying goes, for every complex problem, there’s a simple answer that’s wrong. Housing affordability in San Diego for people without high incomes or home equity is not simply solved. Sure encouraging house sharing can help for some but that’s always been an option if people wanted to choose it.
What Huntsberry seems to imply with “solved if we were willing to marshal the money” and “are willing to invest” (the “invest” euphemism for government spending) is that taxpayers should subsidize people so that they would be able to live in one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.
Who is so entitled to other people’s money and why?
Yes, and selectively pinpointing a time period such as,
“between 2020 and 2023, San Diego’s 65-plus population grew by 9 percent, while every other groups shrank”,
generalizes a fact as a given. This stat was obviously different before Covid, and likely will change over time (as the word boomers wasn’t used) as other groups age changing the percentages.
hello
I am making a real GOOD MONEY (80$ to 92$ / hr. ) 0 online from my laptop. Last month I GOT a check of nearly 21,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, I don’t have to go to the OFFICE. At that point this work opportunity is for you. If you are interested. Simply give it a shot on the accompanying
site link…
I am making a real GOOD MONEY (80$ to 92$ / hr. ) 0 online from my laptop. Last month I GOT a check of nearly 21,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, I don’t have to go to the OFFICE. At that point this work opportunity is for you. If you are interested. Simply give it a shot on the accompanying
site link… https://metter4up56.blogspot.com/
Not mentioned here is the fact that people in this country lack financial literacy and generally do a poor job of managing their finances, including financial planning for retirement. We will ALL be senior citizens one day, but only a fraction of us have actually crunched the numbers and made a financial plan for that future, essentially spending less now to build something for retirement. For some, that financial plan involves moving to a more affordable area.
The author makes the case that the current working generation should pay for the poor financial planning and/or destitution of the current retirees. How is this not a pyramid scheme that will make it more difficult for the current and future generations to save for their own retirements?
hello
https://flytoup69.blogspot.com/
12.24.1953!!!!!!!!!!!