On Monday night, dozens of families, current and even former staff showed up dressed in black for an emergency meeting of the Albert Einstein Academies board – a two-school charter network. It was a vigil of sorts.
Days earlier, Greta Bouterse was unceremoniously fired. Bouterse worked at Einstein for 23 years – about half of that time as principal of the network’s elementary school. For many, confusion about why Bouterse was fired has compounded the anger.
The charter schools’ leadership says she was fired because, unbeknownst to them, she never held an administrative credential that was a requirement for the job.
Superintendent David Sciaretta said he could not comment on personnel matters. He did, however, point to employee qualifications requirements in Einstein’s charter, which includes an administrative credential.
Those gathered to mourn her firing, though, doubt that reasoning. Besides, the credential she didn’t have isn’t actually a statewide requirement for administrators at charter schools, they argued.
In any case, the backlash is just the latest in a string of controversies that have shaken the confidence in the charter’s leadership and split the charter’s community.
That Bouterse was a larger-than-life figure at Einstein was clear during Monday’s meeting. Teacher after teacher and parent after parent stepped up to the mic to heap praise on her leadership and castigate the decision to fire her midway into the school year.
Mary Shannon Heinzelmann, who’s taught art at Einstein’s elementary campus for nearly two decades, said she was outraged by the decision.
“Greta has been a steady, dedicated and highly effective leader for nearly two decades. She has led with integrity, compassion and unwavering dedication to our students, staff and families. To see someone who has given so much to this community dismissed mid-year for a reason that feels disproportionate and unfair is not only disheartening, it harms the very foundations of this school,” Heinzelmann said.
Isabel Treviño, a parent of fifth and second graders at Einstein, said Bouterse’s firing has encouraged her to pull her kids from the school.
“We saw firsthand how she led the elementary school through the pandemic with empathy, discipline and academic rigor,” Treviño said. “In the past year, when things visibly destabilized at AEA, I always thought that a sinking ship can stay afloat with the right captain, which is what Greta Bouterse has been.”
For them, her firing seemed more closely related to the controversies that have rocked the Einstein community.
Earlier this year, parents spent months protesting what they viewed as a watering down of the schools’ trademark German immersion program. The board’s decision to move through with changes to the program ultimately pushed some of them to pull their children from the charter altogether. It also triggered a demand from San Diego Unified, the schools’ authorizer, to fix inaccuracies in its charter.
The trust deficit among some in the community was clear at the meeting. Multiple speakers floated the theory that Bouterse’s firing was related to a bitter fight over whether to decertify the charter’s recently founded union. That fight recently spilled into public view after claims that middle schoolers were included in an anti-union protest without their parent’s consent. The charter has received threats of lawsuits in the aftermath of the protest.
Rita Gonzalez, a student advocate at Einstein, agrees that the union is entangled in the messy reaction to Bouterse. She just disagrees about how.
“Yesterday it was clear, the line has been drawn. If you’re not for [the union] or what they’re saying, you’re public enemy number one,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez has been opposed to the union since day one and lays much of the blame for the division over the past year at its feet. She’s actually one of the staff members who’s been accused of bringing students to the anti-union protest, a charge she denies. Since Bouterse’s firing, she also thinks they’re not being honest with students about why Bouterse was fired.
“I don’t think the clear narrative is being shared to kids on the campus by my colleagues – the kids are being lied to,” Gonzalez said. “The narrative that the superintendent fired Bouterse because he didn’t like her, that’s a false narrative.”
During the meeting Sciaretta, the superintendent, found himself squarely in critics’ crosshairs. Some speakers accused him of being a bully, while others criticized his pay – which is significantly higher than that of administrators.
Mary Klauser, another Einstein parent, said Bouterse’s firing was the latest in a series of “symptoms of a deeper failure of leadership.”
“There is no confidence in the current leadership’s ability to lead this school responsibly,” Klauser said. “In the last year, it has become increasingly clear that the superintendent is not uniting the school community.”
Sciaretta refused to comment.
After returning from closed session, Maria Ortega, the board’s president announced that it had voted to “authorize legal counsel to retain a licensed investigator on the board’s behalf to investigate personnel related complaints.”
Exactly what those complaints entail is unclear.
I learned today that Rita Gonzalez, who is quoted in the article, does not meet the typical qualifications for a Student Advocate. These roles usually require college degrees and certifications in crisis response. She does not have a degree or certifications. As a parent, that is frightening because these positions work directly with our most vulnerable students. Her involvement in the anti-union protest that included students without parent consent shows exactly why proper training matters.
I actually support removing Principal Bouterse if the board determined she was not properly credentialed for her role. My concern is not with accountability itself but with the timing and manner of the decision. And that is exactly why this matters. If we are going to enforce strict credential standards for one leader, then the same level of scrutiny should be applied to all staff, especially those who work directly with children. Consistency is essential for trust, and right now it feels like some people are being held to the highest standard while others (the advocates) are not being held to any standard at all.
You don’t need a polished resume or years of experience to start your online career; ) the internet is the great equalizer where anyone with drive can build success from scratch.
The site is menti0ned on my pr0file name”
There’s one major omission in the story…in that David Sciaretta did not even show up to the meeting to listen to the AEA community. His glaring absence was noted by many who attended, as was the fact that teachers and staff were left to try to explain Ms. Bouterse’s firing without any guidance as to what to tell students when they showed up Monday morning.
Agree, Sciaretta’s glaring absence seems to me to be one of the biggest elements to the story that was not reported. If the title of superintendent of AEA and the outsized salary that comes with it don’t give you the courage to show up to a board meeting and at least hear the feedback of the community you claim to serve, then maybe you’re undeserving of both.
There are serious concerns about how the school’s funds are being managed. Many parents and teachers feel that Superintendent David Sciaretta is disconnected from the school community and unresponsive to repeated efforts to communicate. The superintendent’s compensation appears significantly higher than the California average while teachers are paid far below market standards.
The school no longer functions as a true German immersion program, they cut the whole program into 45 minutes 4 days a week. Also the school‘s academic performance has continued to decline year after year. These issues raise questions about why the board continues to support the current leadership. If board members serve as volunteers and receive no financial benefit, it is unclear why they would allow ongoing mismanagement and declining quality under the current administration.
There are also unverified community allegations about inappropriate relationships involving the superintendent, including with a staff member and a parent. I cannot confirm these claims, but the fact that they are circulating raises significant concerns about professionalism and governance.
There are longstanding and deeply troubling concerns regarding Middle School Principal José Diaz that urgently warrant an independent investigation. Multiple students and parents have reported inappropriate behavior, including instances of him being alone with both male and female students in his office without another staff member present. Families have also raised concerns about students being pressured or threatened with suspension or expulsion if they do not unlock their phones for him.
Parents have repeatedly shared experiences of inaccurate or misleading disciplinary reports, including suspension and expulsion documentation that does not match what actually happened. These issues have been raised to Superintendent David Sciarretta, who has been aware of these concerns yet has failed to take meaningful action.
This pattern of oversight failures shows that the problem is not limited to one individual. Both Principal Diaz and Superintendent Sciarretta must be held accountable for misconduct, lack of transparency, and violations of student trust. For the safety and well-being of all students, an independent, thorough investigation into their actions is absolutely necessary.
Our community deserves leadership that protects students—not leadership that ignores serious complaints. I repeat superintendent Sciaretta and middle school principal Jose Diaz need to be investigated for the well being of the children!