San Diego City Hall in downtown San Diego, on Jan. 13, 2025. / Photo by Vito di Stefano for Voice of San Diego
San Diego City Hall in downtown San Diego, on Jan. 13, 2025. / Photo by Vito di Stefano for Voice of San Diego

This post has been update.

Mayor Todd Gloria’s administration officially sacked the person spearheading the city’s battle against climate change on Tuesday. 

Shelby Buso, the city’s chief sustainability officer, confirmed the news Wednesday but declined to comment further. The move follows a slew of actions initiated by Mayor Todd Gloria that shrink the powers of the city’s department responsible for reducing planet-warming emissions and making San Diego more bikeable and walkable, which Buso led.  

Gloria essentially eliminated the Sustainability and Mobility Department in February when he was forced to make budget cuts. The work of the department was spread under five other departments. Buso acted as the deputy director of that department until it was eliminated. 

As part of the reorganization, the mayor eliminated seven vacant positions in Buso’s department, touted as a savings of $914,000. Buso moved under the direction of the city’s Planning Department.  

It’s not the first time city leaders have put climate programs on the chopping block in budget crunches. Gloria’s proposed fiscal 2025 budget pulled $8.5 million meant for climate equity programs before councilmembers restored it. 

Nicole Darling, a city spokesperson responding on behalf of the mayor’s office, said the city is “fully committed to the critical work of climate action.” She pointed to the reorganization of the Sustainability Department as evidence that its work is now happening across multiple city departments. 

But climate work was, in theory, already baked into the work of each department. Departments already compiled reports each year, showing how their work furthered the goals of the Climate Action Plan. 

Darling said a new chief sustainability officer “will be identified shortly.” 

Environment and climate activists say Buso’s departure is just another piece of evidence that San Diego isn’t doing enough to make good on Gloria’s Climate Action Plan. 

“I think firing the chief sustainability officer is not a sign that person’s duties are important to the city or that whatever was on that person’s plate will actually come to fruition,” said Livia Beaudin, lead attorney at Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation. 

Gloria updated the climate plan in 2022. The Climate Action Campaign and Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation sued the city, alleging the goals passed in 2022 did not actually come with a roadmap for becoming a reality. The parties settled the suit in February of 2024 after the city released a more specific plan for cutting planet-warming emissions from its economy.  

According to the most recently available report, San Diego actually produced more emissions than it cut between 2022 and 2023.  

The city of San Diego actually generated more planet-warming emissions between 2022 and 2023 despite Mayor Todd Gloria's Climate Action Plan which called for major reductions in GHGs./EPIC
The city of San Diego actually generated more planet-warming emissions between 2022 and 2023 despite Mayor Todd Gloria’s Climate Action Plan which called for major reductions in GHGs./EPIC

Beaudin said there’s evidence the city already isn’t holding up its end of the bargain on its settlement with environmentalists. If San Diego isn’t following its Climate Action Plan, it could jeopardize how quickly developers are able to build certain projects in the city. That’s because the Climate Action Plan is how the city meets state Environmental Quality Act rules on behalf of those who want to develop in the city. Without such a plan, some developers would have to do an arduous amount of studies on their own to build in compliance with California climate law.    

The city was supposed to announce new laws requiring buildings eliminate natural gas and run all-electric. That’s the centerpiece of Gloria’s Climate Action Plan, which he announced three years ago, but the city has yet to release a proposal.  

Kelly Lyndon, with the Building Electrification Coalition, said she was surprised at Buso’s ousting. She attended a meeting with her at noon Tuesday, the day she was let go.  

“I get it’s tough to balance a budget and there’s a lot of competing interests,” Lyndon said of the cuts to the city’s climate team. “What irritates me is (the city) won’t acknowledge they’re deprioritizing this. Don’t gaslight us that everything is great and we’re still doing it all.”  

Eddie Price, executive director of the San Diego Urban Sustainability Coalition, said it’s been harder to work with the city on sustainability issues, since the work of the sustainability office was spread across multiple departments. 

“It appears that communities of concern and assistance is merely a press conference and there’s no real outcomes,” he said.  

Clarification: This post has been updated to clarify Shelby Buso’s title in the headline.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

    1. Till I first looked at the document which was of 8430 dollars, I accept that my friend’s brother was like really earning cash in his free time with his pc. T5 Her aunt’s neighbor has been doing this for 10 months and by now repaid the loan on their house and purchased a new Car .

      Get started today… tab on my name

  1. Interesting because the City Manager of Chula Vista Maria Kachadoorian fired their Chief Sustainability Officer Dennis Gakunga two years ago as well, blindsiding the whole Economic Development department.

    1. There’s no loss for the City of Chula Vista. That Dennis Gakunga fraud should have never been hired there in the first place. He is a fraud, a liar and a disgrace. Just look up his “accomplishments” and his employment record, especially with the City of San Diego. It is a miracle Gakunga is not in prison but at this point he’s being used as a temporary DEI hire by any city that wants to show their incompetence.

  2. Not defending Todd Gloria at all, but this looks like fallout from the February reorganization when several departments changed structure. Some departments were merged in with others, yet their director positions remained for some reason. But the City did say they’ll still fill the sustainability position, so it sounds like the policies aren’t changing — just how it’s managed.

  3. Hey ya’ll, little confused by whether Buso was fired/demoted for budget reasons or for performance reasons. Hoping you can clarify. These are the snippets leading to my confusion:

    “As part of the reorganization, the mayor eliminated seven vacant positions in Buso’s department, touted as a savings of $914,000. Buso moved under the direction of the city’s Planning Department. ”
    […]
    Darling said a new chief sustainability officer “will be identified shortly.”

    1. I am not sure why it matters either way. Anyone in that position is not accomplishing anything anyway. They are simply overpaid figure heads who were appointed to those positions for strictly political reasons. You have to go down three or four levels from any “chief” position to find the people who are actually doing any work.

Leave a comment
We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.