Tuesday, March 17, 2009 | Kudos to voiceofsandiego.org for running Randy Dotinga’s well-written stories, “Me and My Genome.”

I signed up for the Scripps Navigenics test in December after reading the first installment of this series. I haven’t got my Scripps Navigenics results back yet, but reading Dotinga’s second installment gives me some perspective on how to react to the “news” when I receive it. Like the author of the story, I am concerned about colon cancer and prostate cancer — most people are since they are leading killers of men.

I am reminded of an old saying that a physician once told me — “if a man lives long enough he will die of prostate cancer” — unlike breast cancer which does not affect most women, every man will eventually get prostate cancer if he does not die of some other problem first.

I had a series of routine prostate tests for “serum PSA” which showed an increase over time. I’ve learned that PSA levels can be influenced by a variety of factors — increased sexual activity correlates with increased PSA levels, so I wasn’t feeling TOO bad about MY increase in PSA, if you catch my meaning. Anyway, my Scripps Clinic urologist recommended a more specific test, developed by San Diego’s own Gen-Probe, that is offered by the Molecular Profiling Institute. The urine test measures the expression of mRNA from the PCA3 gene — if I remember correctly from college biology, RNA stands for “recombinant nucleic acid. As one of the Scripps researchers says in the article — having a gene is one thing, but how the gene is “read” is another factor.

A layperson can think of RNA being produced when DNA is “read” — see also this.

The test was not covered by my medical insurance, so I paid a few hundred dollars out of my pocket.

But my test was negative, thank you very much.

And with this result, my doctor and I decided against a biopsy to check for prostate cancer. The point of my story is simple: If you have a higher genetic risk, and another factor, like elevated PSA, then you might be smart to do other things, like more sophisticated tests or rigorous life style changes.

Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.