Opinion

Revive the Film Commission

Revive the Film Commission

Photo by Ernie Anderson

Actor Donal Logue in "Terriers"

Fix San Diego Opinion Logo It was of great sadness to hear that the San Diego Film Commission had closed their doors after 36 years of service. It had attracted up to $100 million in direct production company spending each year to the San Diego region. No multipliers, no estimates, no guesses:  direct, accountable and audited benefit to the San Diego economy. At that time, the Film Commission was funded by government (the city, county and Unified Port of San Diego) and was attracting $100 of production spending for every dollar the government spent to support the commission; a great investment in anybody’s portfolio. To value it solely by room nights and defund it totally based on that does a great injustice to the value it has to the economic boost it gives the county, city and port. Room night revenue constitutes less than a third of the direct production company spending. That is why it is so important for those governments to fund the Film Commission.

The Film Commission created thousands of local jobs, not just the grips and gaffers of the film industry, but caterers, laundromats and dry cleaners. When “Titanic” filmed in Baja with the aid of the Film Commission, American Shoe Repair fixed 200 pairs of wet shoes a day and had to hire more people. Seventy million dollars was spent on San Diego doctors, nurses, extras, catering and make-up artists, too.

I think it is sad that the benefits are so understated. There was not one lawsuit in 36 years of regulating film production that sometimes entailed stunts, gun fire, and explosions. I credit that to knowledgeable staff with film industry experience in their background, and the great work of the police and fire liaisons.

We had the model film commission in San Diego when it was funded by government. We were the first one founded in California and later the first film commission operating independently of an umbrella organization such as a chamber of commerce or convention and visitors’ bureau. This is significant, because all our funding was used to attract and service film production and our local community, not to assist the umbrella organization. We sought out unusual locations and sold them to production in Hollywood. We pitched story ideas for San Diego and got them. “Anchorman” started out with a Portland destination and storyline and “The Lost World:  Jurassic Park” was originally scripted for New York.

In the 1990s I brought producer Stu Segall to San Diego; he subsequently began a television series business that brought $800 million in direct spending during his years of filming. He hired locals and paid businesses for locations, and thousands of extras had day-to-day work. To name a few, there shows like “Silk Stalkings,” “Renegade,” “Bring it On,” “Pensacola: Wings of Gold,” and “Invisible Man.” Keeping fast-paced television series meant redesigning the permit process and creating a service customized to this lucrative business. Feature films like “Traffic,” “Anchorman,” and “Bruce Almighty” did not fall in our laps. They took pitches in development, location scouts, hard negotiating and when they began filming, providing expert and knowledgeable experience to assist their production. It’s not every day a team like mine could be put together that created such great results.

Like with any business, knowledge, passion and expertise are essential if there is any hope of being successful. The governments in San Diego should re-examine the benefits that the San Diego Film Commission brought to San Diego in the past and provide funding to again generate the level of economic benefit that the region has realized in the past.

Anderson’s commentary has been edited for clarity. See anything in there we should fact check? Tell us here. Want to respond? Submit a commentary.

Voice of San Diego is a nonprofit that depends on you, our readers. Please donate to keep the service strong. Click here to find out more about our supporters and how we operate independently.


Cathy Anderson

Cathy Anderson

Cathy Anderson was the Film Commission's CEO and film commissioner between 1997 and 2011.

  • 1 Posts
  • 9
    Followers

Show comments
Before you comment, read these simple guidelines on what is not allowed.

7 comments
C Marino
C Marino

In response to Jim's comments- who do you think benefited financially from these shoots? Local film crew (Lighting, grip, hair make-up, stunt, set, coordinators, etc.), local caterers, hotels that were utilized to put up the outside Production team, local police, fire, parking, permit fees, local production rental companies, local hardware, grocery, and other stores were the sources of supplies, and MUCH more. This all generated money to stimulate the LOCAL San Diego economy!! We lived there, worked there, shopped there, and went out to eat and see movies there. In other words, our income was spent there supporting all of the local businesses. My husband and I are very proud to have been a part of the San Diego Production family during Cathy Anderson's very successful building up and overseeing all of San Diego's production for her many years of dedication and hard work as Film Commissioner. Other cities across the country that need money to stimulate their economy are fighting to get the film companies to come to their city because of the incredible amount of money generated by production. I have complete trust that Cathy's facts and figures are accurate.

Jim Neri
Jim Neri

I would love to see the numbers that back up the $100 million claim since it is hard to believe we would let that public money go. My experiences watching film crews operate at Windansea Beach in La Jolla is that they arrive, take over the area, bring their own catered food, film their scene, and go back to LA without spending a dime locally. San Diego is a convenient location for these shoots and we should charge for them. If we are, let's see the numbers and where the money is going for the betterment of San Diego.

Jim Neri
Jim Neri subscribermember

I would love to see the numbers that back up the $100 million claim since it is hard to believe we would let that public money go. My experiences watching film crews operate at Windansea Beach in La Jolla is that they arrive, take over the area, bring their own catered food, film their scene, and go back to LA without spending a dime locally. San Diego is a convenient location for these shoots and we should charge for them. If we are, let's see the numbers and where the money is going for the betterment of San Diego.

David Hall
David Hall

If Ms. Anderson's description is accurate, and there's no reason to believe otherwise, the Tourism Authority has made a bad business decision. Perhaps it is time to take a good hard look at how that agency is being managed and reconsider its leadership.

David Hall
David Hall subscriber

If Ms. Anderson's description is accurate, and there's no reason to believe otherwise, the Tourism Authority has made a bad business decision. Perhaps it is time to take a good hard look at how that agency is being managed and reconsider its leadership.

Julie Wright
Julie Wright

The problem with that is that the Tourism Authority also brings a high return on investment and, thanks to our troubled Mayor, the entire organization was decimated. The ramifications for both the visitor industry and film location shooting -- both of which bring new money to San Diego -- are not just being felt now but far into the future. This problem needs to be solved where it started -- by the Mayor, or preferably a new Mayor. Sadly it's always more expensive to restart something and so to do it right for both tourism and film will take even more money.

Julie Wright
Julie Wright subscribermember

The problem with that is that the Tourism Authority also brings a high return on investment and, thanks to our troubled Mayor, the entire organization was decimated. The ramifications for both the visitor industry and film location shooting -- both of which bring new money to San Diego -- are not just being felt now but far into the future. This problem needs to be solved where it started -- by the Mayor, or preferably a new Mayor. Sadly it's always more expensive to restart something and so to do it right for both tourism and film will take even more money.