Fletcher: Raise the Linkage Fee

Fletcher: Raise the Linkage Fee

Photo by Sam Hodgson

Nathan Fletcher

Mayoral candidate Nathan Fletcher says San Diego should raise the fee it charges commercial developers to help subsidize low-income housing projects. It’s called a linkage fee.

Fletcher appeared as a guest on this week’s episode of Voice of San Diego Radio—which you should subscribe to on iTunes!—Fletcher made clear the fee as currently set is too low. (The show airs on Saturdays, and we’ll have it for you Sunday.)

Fletcher wasn’t so clear just a few days earlier, at a mayoral debate. His opponents — Democratic Councilman David Alvarez and Republican Councilman Kevin Faulconer — came out for and against a proposed increase, respectively.

The City Council is scheduled to vote on a proposal Nov. 4 to increase the fee.

The proposal would raise the fee to 1.5 percent of current construction costs. That’s where the fee was set in 1990, when it was first implemented. In 1996 it was cut in half, and it’s stayed there ever since.

Two years ago, the Council voted against a proposal to double the fee, which would have brought it to 1.5 percent of 1990′s construction costs. The current proposal would bring the fee to 1.5 percent of current costs, or what works out to a roughly 500 percent increase.

In this exchange on the podcast, Fletcher seems to come out in support of a middle proposal, returning the fee to what it was before it was cut in half in 1996.

But there’s no question: He supports increasing the fee.

Scott Lewis: Do you have a position on what you would do if you were leading the city and this was coming forward?

Fletcher: Well, clearly it needs to be adjusted back up. Sixteen years ago it was cut in half, and it needs to be adjusted back up. But this is not significantly different from the Barrio Logan issue. You have one group of people that says, ‘I take a pledge to toe the industry line no matter what,’ and then you have another group of folks who say, ‘We’ll do the immediate 500 or 800 whatever percentage it is overnight,’ and I’ve just got to, here again, I don’t know, call me crazy, I’ve got to think that there has to be some way to look at what other cities do to figure out a better way to do it. But I want to make — clearly it has to go back up, it’s a question of how you get there and how you do it in a smooth way, and you do it in a way that meets the needs.

But the linkage fee only addresses subsidized housing projects. For everyone who isn’t eligible for those programs — or who’s eligible but can’t access the program — housing costs need to be addressed through broad mechanisms, like increasing density to increase the supply of homes.

So, is Fletcher in favor of increasing density in the city?

We asked him, and here was his response:

Fletcher: Well, we’re going to have to increase density. I mean the reality as I see it  —minus some of the areas in Otay that are prime zoned industrial land where I think we can do manufacturing — we’re pretty much built out, and what we have in open space we need to preserve and protect, because you can never get that back.

And so the question is, SANDAG says there are a million more people coming by 2050, those aren’t all new people, some of those will be our kids and grandkids of those who stay, and we’re going to have to increase densities. But I have to tell you, neighborhoods are right to say ‘Look, we’re not going to accept density’ until we show them a real investment in things like transit. I think we can make some increase in density by focusing on live, work, play in the same community.

Voice of San Diego is a nonprofit that depends on you, our readers. Please donate to keep the service strong. Click here to find out more about our supporters and how we operate independently.


Andrew Keatts

Andrew Keatts

I'm Andrew Keatts, a reporter for Voice of San Diego. Please contact me if you'd like at andrew.keatts@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.325.0529.

  • 185 Posts
  • 0
    Followers

Show comments
Before you comment, read these simple guidelines on what is not allowed.

10 comments
LocalBoy
LocalBoy

Mr. Hoffman is right in a certain way. If the City planners would simply reduce the parking requirements, a developer could reduce costs dramatically and reduce rents based upon those cost reductions. Unfortunately, most market-rate developers would simply charge the maximum even with the reduced parking costs. Most affordable housing developers would benefit greatly by reducing the amount of up-front subsidies that come from the local community (the former CCDC, Housing Commission, County Dept. of Housing, etc.). They could build more affordable housing without the huge per unit subsidies required because bureaucrats that "require" something that many times is overkill. But because the bureaucrats often don't look at real innovation, Mr. Fletcher is forced to advocate for more local funding to meet the demands of the bureaucrats. Most city council folks don't have a clue how all this works. They simply pontificate about high costs without ever working on real solutions such as parking reductions.

Joe Jones
Joe Jones

C'mon, VOSD, cut Mr. Fletcher some slack. Clearly, he had forgotten he was currently a Democrat when he went soft on linkage during the debate. Later, after he checked his voter registration card, he was able to take a strong Democratic position on the issue. Perfectly understandable.

Joe Jones
Joe Jones subscriber

C'mon, VOSD, cut Mr. Fletcher some slack. Clearly, he had forgotten he was currently a Democrat when he went soft on linkage during the debate. Later, after he checked his voter registration card, he was able to take a strong Democratic position on the issue. Perfectly understandable.

Matt Finish
Matt Finish

A few trillion dollars dumped into the war on poverty and it's been just about as successful as other "wars" we've waged, such as the war on drugs or the war on terror. Mainly, they've created more of the problem they're supposedly trying to eradicate. A shining example of the government's inability to do what it thinks it can by force. Let's dump more into it, in the form of half million dollar downtown condos for the "poor", like the ones at Ten Fifty B.

Matt Finish
Matt Finish subscriber

A few trillion dollars dumped into the war on poverty and it's been just about as successful as other "wars" we've waged, such as the war on drugs or the war on terror. Mainly, they've created more of the problem they're supposedly trying to eradicate. A shining example of the government's inability to do what it thinks it can by force. Let's dump more into it, in the form of half million dollar downtown condos for the "poor", like the ones at Ten Fifty B.

TJ Apple
TJ Apple

Wow what a fall, this guy goes from Republican to Independent to Democrat and now settles as a Progressive Socialist, Yikes! Looks to be trying to get elected by the same misguided populus that brought us Filner - God save the Queen.

Derek Hofmann
Derek Hofmann

To increase the amount of affordable housing, we can either eliminate the laws that prevented them from being built (see the article linked below), or we could create new laws like this "linkage fee" to build affordable housing. Shouldn't the solution that increases freedom be favored by default? Why does Nathan Fletcher prefer the solution that reduces freedom?Streetsblog Capitol Hillhttp://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/09/16/apartment-blockers/Alan Durning is the executive director and founder of Sightline Institute, a think tank on sustainability issues in the Pacific Northwest. This article, originally posted on Sightline's blog, is #9 in their series, "Parking? Lots!" Have you ever watc...

Derek Hofmann
Derek Hofmann subscribermember

To increase the amount of affordable housing, we can either eliminate the laws that prevented them from being built (see the article linked below), or we could create new laws like this "linkage fee" to build affordable housing. Shouldn't the solution that increases freedom be favored by default? Why does Nathan Fletcher prefer the solution that reduces freedom?Streetsblog Capitol Hillhttp://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/09/16/apartment-blockers/Alan Durning is the executive director and founder of Sightline Institute, a think tank on sustainability issues in the Pacific Northwest. This article, originally posted on Sightline's blog, is #9 in their series, "Parking? Lots!" Have you ever watc...

Jim Jones
Jim Jones

Having destroyed his chances to win from the right, Fletcher will now embrace the words of the left, while being the Jacob's pet politician, part of their collection. He's a good actor, I'll say that for him.

Jim Jones
Jim Jones subscriber

Having destroyed his chances to win from the right, Fletcher will now embrace the words of the left, while being the Jacob's pet politician, part of their collection. He's a good actor, I'll say that for him.