I came across this snippet on the King/Chavez website while researching my story on teacher dismissals and union organizing at the Barrio Logan schools. It reads:

The staff is the lifeblood of the organization.  This is measured through the retention rates of quality employees … How unsentimental is the leader in ‘trimming the tree’ when staff does not embody quality or has a poisonous effect on culture and climate?

Whether or not you agree with the statement, it struck me as a vivid explanation of what the school did, and why it might have done it. “Trimming the tree” seems to mean cutting employees. “Embody quality” translates to me as being a good teacher. And having “a poisonous effect on culture or climate” sounds like being a downer or a troublemaker.

Is that a good philosophy? Like most things in education reform, it depends whom you ask. And whether it will work out for the better or worse at King/Chavez remains to be seen.


Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.