Journalism won’t die if you donate. Support Voice of San Diego today!
The California city of Vallejo is starting to receive national news coverage for its decision not to touch its pension debts in its plan to emerge from bankruptcy.
Barron’s, a weekly finance magazine, wrote an in-depth cover story today on the pressures facing public pension systems. Vallejo received a few mentions. The piece ended by detailing all of the cutbacks Vallejo has made because of bankruptcy: employee health-care benefits, police officers and payments to bondholders:
The only thing that will be left untouched? The very thing that tipped the California city into Chapter 9 — its $84 billion in future pension obligations.
The point is important for San Diego, as we noted extensively in a story last month. Those against San Diego considering municipal bankruptcy argue that pension benefits couldn’t be decreased in a filing and Vallejo’s case serves as an example.
It appears legally possible for a city to reduce pension benefits through bankruptcy. No one has tried it before, but someone will. That bankruptcy will be a costly war with an uncertain outcome.
Barron’s also quotes, Jim Spiotto, a Chicago-based municipal bond restructuring expert, who is surprised cites haven’t tried to reform their outstanding pension debts instead of upsetting bondholders and declaring bankruptcy:
“I just can’t believe that any bond issuer would be willing to suffer the stigma of defaulting on their general-obligation debt as a result of having to fund future pension obligations, but such a situation is no longer beyond the realm of possibility,” [Spiotto] observes.
There’s been an explosion of national news interest in public pensions since a well-respected think tank issued a report last month showing that eight states’ pension systems were underfunded by more than a third. This Barron’s story is one of the most detailed I’ve seen to date.
— LIAM DILLON