Image via Shutterstock

Carlsbad is considering a moratorium on new development in two of its oldest neighborhoods — in the name of housing affordability and mobility.

Last month, Councilwoman Barbara Hamilton pitched her fellow City Council members on a six-month pause in the review process for new projects. In the meantime, she asked officials to reassess the ability of developers to buy their way around the city’s parking and affordable housing requirements.

Hamilton said she was sounding the alarm on the rapid pace of development that primarily benefited wealthier residents and put at risk the character and charm of the Village and Barrio.

Sound an alarm she did. But not in the way she might have expected.

Most of the members of the public at a June 25 meeting expressed opposition to a temporary ban on development in the Village and Barrio. They included pro-housing activists and property owners who argued that a delay would only help push development further away from the city’s core, making traffic worse for everyone while doing nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“You’ve been averaging, for the last seven years, approximately 400 units a year in construction — it’s hardly runaway growth,” Michael McSweeney, senior public policy adviser for the Building Industry Association, told the City Council.

Another speaker pointed to a report by the chief economist for San Francisco, where in 2015 residents considered an 18-month ban on new housing in the Mission District. Before the initiative was defeated at the ballot box, the report concluded that a temporary moratorium would cause rental prices to increase across the city and was unlikely to prevent gentrification, as its supporters claimed.

The bulk of Carlsbad’s housing supply for “very-low income residents” is already located in the Village and Barrio, and according to city staff, those neighborhoods have the highest densities in the city because of their proximity to transit.

Community and economic development director Debbie Fountain also cautioned elected officials at the June 25 meeting that California housing regulators were monitoring their discussion of a temporary moratorium. To declare an emergency of this kind in Carlsbad, officials would need to cite specific and immediate threats to the public health, safety and welfare.

Carlsbad’s politics and priorities are changing. And it seems clear that the Democrats who took control of the City Council in November are looking for ways to reconcile the beach-town vibe they love with the larger housing crisis that’s playing out across California. What we’re witnessing is not necessarily partisan, but it is a clash of values within the coastal liberal establishment as development shifts from open space to existing neighborhoods.

Hamilton and other members of the Council — although they punted the moratorium discussion until later in the summer — have been critical of their predecessors’ approach to planning and want more say over the type of housing that’s being constructed. In the Barrio, for instance, the city’s planning commission has the final authority on housing designs, not the Council.

The document at the center of this conversation is the Village Barrio Master Plan, which took years to craft and involved lots of feedback from consultants and residents. It lays out a vision for both neighborhoods over the next 20 years with an eye on public spaces and mobility, solidifying a 45-foot height limit for new buildings. It includes “a number of grand ideas,” the Union-Tribune reported in 2018, “that could be pursued in the future, such as closing part of Grand Avenue to vehicles and turning [the area] into a pedestrian promenade.”

Councilwoman Cori Schumacher was the lone Council member to vote no on the master plan in 2018. She argued that officials were giving too much leeway to the building industry over the city’s future look and feel. She proposed that developers be limited to 35 feet unless they agreed to include a certain number of affordable units in the overall project. In that case, they could take advantage of the full 45 feet.

Her remarks weren’t enough to sway the other members of the Council at the time.

So far, though, Schumacher has offered the harshest criticism of the moratorium that Hamilton is proposing.

“In the middle of a housing crisis, you can’t say because we’re not hitting the character we want … we want to stop development to reassess,” Schumacher said. “It’s not responsible.”

The city still has control over the things that Hamilton wants to revisit — like parking and affordable housing requirements — so a moratorium wouldn’t accomplish anything, Schumacher argued. But on the bright side, she said, the conversation should “set a precedent” in the community on what the Council wants to see when it comes to affordable housing.

“I still feel a sense of urgency,” Hamilton told her colleagues, but agreed to drop the issue for now. Officials are reviewing the city’s inclusionary housing policy, and the California Coastal Commission is expected to release comments on the Village Barrio Master Plan in August. Hamilton plans to revisit the possibility of a temporary moratorium then.

“I just think we need to be honest about what we’re doing,” she told me Wednesday.

There’s an incongruity, she said, between the values of the community on the one hand, the city’s existing policies and long-term goals, and the larger push across the state to create more housing and better public transit. She noted, for instance, that 80 percent of the new units that Carlsbad is supposed to build are supposed to be located in the Village and Barrio, but that’s not happening. Those new units are on the luxury end.

“My end goal is not to stop development,” she said. “My goal is to mitigate the actual impacts of development in the community, so when we’re done building, we can look back in 10 years and say, ‘Yeah, that’s what we wanted to do,’ and we exercised our local control.”

For what it’s worth: Check out my colleague Lisa Halverstadt’s report about San Diego’s recent changes to its inclusionary housing policy. Progressives had wanted City Council President Georgette Gómez to do away with the fee entirely and force developers to set aside at least 15 percent of units for low-income residents. Instead, she proposed that the city simply increase the fee.

Republicans Are Lining Up to Replace Hunter

Former Escondido Mayor Sam Abed is the latest Republican to challenge Rep. Duncan Hunter in the 50th Congressional District. He joins El Cajon Mayor Bill Wells and two others. Darrell Issa is reportedly considering it too.

Abed told the Union-Tribune that his own entry into the race is not about Hunter per se. It’s about stopping the Democratic Party and its “very socialist” candidate from flipping another Southern California district.

For the record, Ammar Campa-Najjar doesn’t sound very socialist. In the last election he told Rolling Stone magazine that he was opposed to the state gas tax, calling it regressive and foolish, and was skeptical of Medicare for All. (I’ve also yet to hear him cite Eugene Debs or quote from “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon.”)

In any case, Abed said he doubted that Hunter’s political career would survive his legal troubles — the congressman is accused of using some $250,000 worth of campaign money for personal expenses. Abed then offered praise and criticism of Hunter in the same breath.

“I have a great respect for his service to our country,” Abed told the U-T. “However, what he did was unacceptable, and I don’t think he’s going to make it and he has compromised the representation of the 750,000 people in the 50th District.”

The Week in Energy and Water Woes

Solana Beach is a small town, but its energy program is closely watched because it was the first — and probably not the last — “community choice” agency in the county. The Solana Energy Alliance, a nonprofit, was launched last summer to compete with the investor-owned San Diego Gas & Electric. It was pitched to residents as a cheaper, greener alternative.

But as Ry Rivard noted this week, Solana Beach is charging more for 100 percent green energy than SDG&E: $108 per month versus $106 a month for a typical customer.

Vista, San Marcos and Escondido are considering the formation of their own public energy system, according to the Coast News.

Rivard also reported this week that San Diego’s major water supplier failed to fully treat drinking water in order to remove viruses and a nasty parasite. The problem occurred at San Diego County Water Authority’s treatment plant near San Marcos back in April.

State regulators cited the San Diego County Water Authority for the failure but said the water “likely” met state safety standards before reaching customers. Godspeed. Here’s a map of the neighborhoods that received at-risk water, including Carlsbad and Oceanside and other large swaths of North County.

In Other News

Jesse Marx is a former Voice of San Diego associate editor.

Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.