The Morning Report
Get the news and information you need to take on the day.
One overarching takeaway was clear when I read through the police review board’s investigation into a 2015 shooting I’ve been following since it happened: Everything the victim did leading up to the shooting was used against him, while everything the police officer did – even if it violated policy – was used to his benefit.
The review board, for example, considered documents related to Fridoon Nehad’s immigration status as it investigated the case – though immigration played no role in the shooting. And when Bonnie Dumanis weighed whether to charge the officer involved, she laid out Nehad’s previous interactions with police – as if those, too, were in any way relevant to what happened. They were not.
But the review board concluded that because SDPD Officer Neal Browder hadn’t turned on his body camera before the shooting, he deserved “the benefit of the doubt” as far as whether his actions were reasonable. Breaking the rules, it turned out, served him pretty well.
This same dynamic – the idea that victims deserve their own deaths, while cops deserve grace and understanding – certainly isn’t unique.
Also this week, the Union-Tribune reported on some truly disturbing allegations against a San Diego Sheriff’s deputy – but in doing so, bizarrely spent multiple paragraphs describing the officer’s high school athletic career. He was afforded the grace of being known for other accomplishments beyond the heinous acts at the center of the story.
Over and over, we give this grace, and these benefits, only to the people who deserve them least.
Last year, in our series on law enforcement officers who’ve themselves been convicted of crimes, we found countless reminders that the system bends over backward to reward and excuse officers – even when they’re the ones who’ve broken the law.
When a CHP officer from Alpine battered his wife and then destroyed property, the judge determining his fate took pains to let him know he could have his service weapon back if he wanted.
“You know, I’m not distrusting you,” Judge Roger Krauel told the man as he was pleading guilty to a crime. “I’m not thinking I’m dealing with some crook that I need to worry about what he’s gonna do when he turns around and leaves.”
What VOSD Learned This Week
The Nehad case is far from the only time body cameras have failed to live up to their promise. One homeless man’s encounter was captured by three different body cameras – yet none of the footage was available to him to aid in his defense.
Speaking of cameras that were sold to the public as a transparency tool, Jesse Marx revealed that the transit and mobility data that was a key selling point of the smart streetlights program has quietly been turned off. The cameras are now exclusively a tool for the police.
We wrapped these stories together for our discussion on this week’s podcast.
Critics have contended for years that community planning groups are composed of mostly older, white homeowners. Now data compiled by the city proves them right.
Local pension funds took massive hits when the pandemic first descended, but it looks like they’ve bounced back a bit.
We’re starting to get a clearer picture of what pollutants and chemicals were released into the air as a result of the massive Navy ship fire earlier this month.
Tensions consumed National School District’s leadership last year, then the district’s top business administrator got paid $147,000 to resign.
What I’m Reading
- How we failed John Lewis and C.T. Vivian. (Rolling Stone)
- Portland is the City of Bridges, but when it comes to how police have reacted to the federal government’s intrusion in the city, “they’re marooned on an island of pride, bravado and self-pity.” (Oregonian)
- One 2020 presidential candidate made police reform the centerpiece of his campaign – maybe we should have listened harder. (New York Magazine)
- “So many of us did everything the government asked, and officials responded by doing … nothing.” (Washington Post)
Line of the Week
“The turtlenecked girl had an idea.” – This is the most wonderfully efficient description of The Babysitter’s Club.