The Morning Report
Get the news and information you need to take on the day.
Reader CD wrote me today, incredulous at the perspective of another reader last week who’d observed younger co-workers content to rent until they can “buy next to the beach on their 80k incomes.” CD said he’s still a real estate investor, here and elsewhere.
Here’s what CD said:
Wow-what planet is that guy on? I’m a 58 year old born and raised in San Diego. My father was a private investor in multi-family rentals. …
How could a rational person expect to buy next to the beach for $2,000 per month? Is the problem the incredible lack of knowledge of economics? If prices (not values), fell to that point there would be an amazing rush to buy which in turn would push prices back up.
As you know everything is interconnected; other than very short term housing prices must have a relationship to replacement costs. Aside from that, IF prices declined that much there would be significant economic costs to all of us with a declining standard of living.
Maybe the thought wasn’t clear; if housing prices fell below replacement cost for a long period of time then there wouldn’t be any more construction or construction-related manufacturing or jobs.
As I recall your original question was at what point would a person jump in to buy. I don’t have an answer to that.
Here’s a different take. Reader PD thinks I should change the question altogether. After counting upfront costs — down payment, closing costs, taxes, insurance, escrow — and monthly costs, and interest over the term of the mortgage, PD argues renting is a no-brainer.
The question should be: How much money can I save by not purchasing a home in San Diego? …
The myth of housing inflation and savings on taxes was dreamed up by realtors. It is just
that, a myth.
Today or any day. If you need living quarters, lease. If you ever need a new bathroom,
you’ll not have to pay the $3600.00, as I did not have to do because my dear landlord had to foot that bill and I was able to add to my bank account.