Good morning from Hillcrest.

  • We’ll lead off with a San Diego city auditor report on a bonus program in the water and wastewater departments. The program overstated its savings by $10.7 million over four years and prompted calls for reform from City Council members. The audit also notes that the program resulted in greater efficiency and performance improvements.
  • A city commission urged raises starting next year for San Diego’s mayor and city council members, but no one seems inclined to grant them.
  • The Port District and a developer in Chula Vista agreed to swap land on the city’s bay front, paving the way for a 250-room hotel and 1,500-unit condominium project.
  • There should be no more delay on a ballot measure that would make San Diego’s “strong mayor” form of government permanent, the U-T editorializes.
  • If downtown San Diego is going to be the center of the city’s future growth, then should it continue to receive a disproportionate share of resources? A follow up to my Q&A with downtown redevelopment head Fred Maas from last week.
  • Should the city regulate pay day lenders? CityBeat reports.
  • Last, proponents and opponents of the failed recall campaign against an Oceanside city councilman spent more than $400,000.

— LIAM DILLON

Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.