Yesterday, the U-T got its hands on a long-awaited study on a city of San Diego controversial pension benefit.

The article confirms what union officials had told us a few weeks ago. The Deferred Retirement Option Plan, or DROP, costs the city money but was within the margin of error for being considered a net zero to the city’s bottom line. The city’s municipal code says DROP “is intended to be cost neutral.”

DROP’s cost was pegged at $149 million. But before you light all of your hair on fire, know that before the study began both city and union officials agreed on a 2 percent margin of error. It’s the same standard used in a similar study in Los Angeles.

For years, pension hawks have lambasted the program as the epitome of excess in the pension system. It’s harder to make that claim now, especially since the city eliminated the plan for new hires in 2005.

Still, $149 million is a big number. The U-T said Mayor Jerry Sanders would ask City Council for further analysis to reduce costs.

Here’s a link to background on DROP and the U-T story also links to a presentation on the study.

Please contact Liam Dillon directly at or 619.550.5663 and follow him on Twitter:

Liam Dillon was formerly a senior reporter and assistant editor for Voice of San Diego. He led VOSD’s investigations and wrote about how regular people...

Leave a comment

We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.